iClaims logo
Internal operations platform

Claim Detail

Search result → immediate full claim view.
Home
Claim explorer / evidence thread
Claim 26990
TRI 1202 • Ashlee • Manufacturer Denied • dutchman
Next Recommended Action

Escalate to State

Payment deadline violated
Reason
OEM Response Deadline Exceeded
Deadline
Payment deadline violated
Estimated recovery
Pending payment match
risk 0.00 deadline Overdue / escalation ready images 0 matched 0 review 9

Warranty deadline timeline

Track where the claim sits in the recovery workflow, how many days have elapsed, and whether the auto-approval window or payment deadline is already in play.
Uploaded
Completed stage
145d elapsed • 0d remaining
Analyzed
Completed stage
145d elapsed • 0d remaining
Awaiting OEM
Completed stage
145d elapsed • 0d remaining
Auto-Approved
Completed stage
145d elapsed • 0d remaining
Payment Due
Completed stage
145d elapsed • 0d remaining
Escalation Eligible
Overdue / escalation ready
145d elapsed • 0d remaining • Overdue
Resolved
Upcoming statutory deadline
145d elapsed • 0d remaining

AI Claim Analysis

Estimated Recovery Amount
Pending payment match
What this claim may still be worth based on current evidence.
Compliance Score
100/100
Higher is cleaner. Lower means more missing support, more friction, or more OEM pushback.
Violations Detected
2
OEM Response Deadline Exceeded • Payment Deadline Exceeded
Missing Items
9
No active evidence gaps are listed.
Deadline Status
Overdue / escalation ready
145 days open in the visible workflow.
Recommended Action
Escalate to State
This is the fastest next move from the current workflow stage.

Dossier completeness

Files 11 • RO lines 3 • human-described photos 9 • 3C yellow • reconciliation reconciled • linked side comments 1
Gaps: three c not quality ready • sidebar comment coherence not supported

US dispute readiness

Evidence packet check

Compact packet candidate
Operational preflight for US warranty escalation: packet size, chronology, cross-references, witness checks, source grounding, and backup evidence.
Estimated pack size
11
Proxy count from docs, images, comments, and claim lines. Actual PDF pages still need final preflight.
Evidence packet lane
Compact packet candidate
Small enough for a compact escalation packet, assuming final PDFs stay clean.
Chronology
Ready to order
Visible span: Jun 8, 2026, 7:49 PM to Jun 25, 2026, 2:54 AM.
Indexed evidence
2 docs / 9 images
Use only the strongest evidence in the escalation packet; keep the rest as support material.
Cross-reference base
Available
Line items, comments, or gap flags can be tied back to supporting material.
Witness verification
Human verification required
Any statement or affidavit output must be checked by the witness before use.
AI / citation gate
Manual check required
Escalation material must keep facts, inferences, citations, and source documents separated.
Expert evidence pressure
Not signalled
No expert-evidence trigger is visible from the current image rollup.
Escalation posture
Escalation watch
145 days open in the visible workflow; risk score 0.00.

Claim Summary

Evidence summary
No evidence summary yet.
Path
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/TRI 1202/Manufacturer Denied Claims/26990/Denied claim.pdf
Timeline
First seen Jun 8, 2026, 7:49 PM • last seen Jun 25, 2026, 2:54 AM
Evidence flags
No active evidence gap flags

Comment Intelligence

Thread depth
5 indexed side comments on this claim.
Latest visible thread signal
Oct 19, 2026, 9:08 PM • processor • TESTING AND LEARNING — TRI 1202 / RO 26990. Internal evidence review only; not a final coverage decision. Read-only factual assessment. A Keystone pre-authorization for claim/RO 26990 visibly shows Denied, with rationale
Role mix
Dealer 0 • OEM 0 • Processor 4
Decision cues
Denial signals 5 • info / missing-doc asks 2 • approval signals 3
Best move
Work missing-doc or reply asks first from the thread.

Quick Actions

Back to search results
Run the same search again.
Open focused evidence thread
Jump straight into Dropbox side comments, notes, and support documents.
Open claim explorer
Return to the main recovery queue view.
Open evidence room
See the quick-rule cards first, then open the legal basis only if needed.

Images

Claim Lines

complaint
AT THE DINETTE TABLE ONE SIDE HAS 2 CHAIRS AND A BENCH ON THE OTHER SIDE. THE BENCH DOES NOT HAVE A BACK THAT IS ATTACHED, WHEN YOU MOVE THE BENCH TO EAT THE BACK STAYS ON THE WALL.
needs-review • confidence 0.32
complaint
AT THE DINETTE TABLE ONE SIDE HAS 2 CHAIRS AND A BENCH ON THE OTHER SIDE. THE BENCH DOES NOT HAVE A BACK THAT IS ATTACHED, WHEN YOU MOVE THE BENCH TO EAT THE BACK STAYS ON THE WALL.
needs-review • confidence 0.32
complaint
AT THE DINETTE TABLE ONE SIDE HAS 2 CHAIRS AND A BENCH ON THE OTHER SIDE. THE BENCH DOES NOT HAVE A BACK THAT IS ATTACHED, WHEN YOU MOVE THE BENCH TO EAT THE BACK STAYS ON THE WALL.
needs-review • confidence 0.15
cause
BENCH HAS NO BACK THAT STAYS ON WHEN CUSTOMER MOVES IT TO EAT. THE TABLE IS TO FAR AWAY FROM THE BENCH TO NOT MOVE IT UP TO EAT. TN, TRI-AM RV CENTER-EAST Customer #: 47602
needs-review • confidence 0.29
cause
BENCH HAS NO BACK THAT STAYS ON WHEN CUSTOMER MOVES IT TO EAT. THE TABLE IS TO FAR AWAY FROM THE BENCH TO NOT MOVE IT UP TO EAT. TN, TRI-AM RV CENTER-EAST Customer #: 47602
needs-review • confidence 0.29
cause
BENCH HAS NO BACK THAT STAYS ON WHEN CUSTOMER MOVES IT TO EAT. THE TABLE IS TO FAR AWAY FROM THE BENCH TO NOT MOVE IT UP TO EAT. TN, TRI-AM RV CENTER-EAST Customer #: 47602
needs-review • confidence 0.09
correction
NEED TO REPLACE THE BENCH WITH THE 2 CHAIRS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TABLE
needs-review • confidence 0.26
correction
NEED TO REPLACE THE BENCH WITH THE 2 CHAIRS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TABLE
needs-review • confidence 0.26
correction
NEED TO REPLACE THE BENCH WITH THE 2 CHAIRS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TABLE
needs-review • confidence 0.09

Evidence Thread

Ashlee Olsen
processor • Apr 14, 2026, 11:53 AM
submitted PREAUTH97101
Ashlee Olsen
processor • Apr 16, 2026, 5:05 PM
denied-KRV built in accordance with current manufacturing specifications
Ashlee Olsen
processor • Apr 16, 2026, 5:06 PM
@Stephanie D FYI
Stephanie Davis
dealer_or_external • Apr 17, 2026, 9:04 AM
Thank you, I have let Russ know.
iClaims AI
processor • Oct 19, 2026, 9:08 PM
TESTING AND LEARNING — TRI 1202 / RO 26990. Internal evidence review only; not a final coverage decision. Read-only factual assessment. A Keystone pre-authorization for claim/RO 26990 visibly shows Denied, with rationale that the unit was built to current manufacturing specifications, for the freestanding-chair replacement operation. The packet coherently documents the dinette seating configuration and reported usability concern, but it does not establish a completed repair, final claim adjudication, payment, or final outcome. Native Dropbox discussion includes: denied-KRV built in accordance with current manufacturing specifications (discussion entry, not proof of final payment). Outstanding evidence: Final manufacturer warranty-claim submission, any later decision or appeal history, and a complete disposition record beyond the denied pre-authorization print.; Part numbers, parts request/order, repair authorization or rejection for the proposed bench/chair change, and shipment, receipt, or return documentation.; Completed/signed repair order, technician repair narrative, installation record, and post-repair photos or functional/fit verification.. No final payment or completed adjudication is inferred from folder placement. @Chris B @Heidi H @Tricia H

Claim Files

Denied claim.pdf
pdf • Apr 16, 2026, 5:07 PM • 198,314 bytes
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/TRI 1202/Manufacturer Denied Claims/26990/Denied claim.pdf
WO.pdf
pdf • Apr 14, 2026, 9:59 AM • 389,204 bytes
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/TRI 1202/Manufacturer Denied Claims/26990/WO.pdf