Claim explorer / evidence thread
Claim 10966
GRE 8220 • Alix • Write Off • keystone
risk 0.00
deadline Overdue / escalation ready
images 0
matched 0
review 4
Warranty deadline timeline
Track where the claim sits in the recovery workflow, how many days have elapsed, and whether the auto-approval window or payment deadline is already in play.
Uploaded
Completed stage
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
Analyzed
Completed stage
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
Awaiting OEM
Completed stage
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
Auto-Approved
Completed stage
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
Payment Due
Completed stage
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
Escalation Eligible
Overdue / escalation ready
178d elapsed • 0d remaining • Overdue
Resolved
Upcoming statutory deadline
178d elapsed • 0d remaining
AI Claim Analysis
Estimated Recovery Amount
$250.00
What this claim may still be worth based on current evidence.
Compliance Score
100/100
Higher is cleaner. Lower means more missing support, more friction, or more OEM pushback.
Violations Detected
2
OEM Response Deadline Exceeded • Payment Deadline Exceeded
Missing Items
4
No active evidence gaps are listed.
Deadline Status
Overdue / escalation ready
178 days open in the visible workflow.
Recommended Action
Escalate to State
This is the fastest next move from the current workflow stage.
Dossier completeness
Files 4 • RO lines 3 • human-described photos 1 • 3C red • reconciliation reconciled • linked side comments 1
Gaps: three c not quality ready • sidebar comment coherence not supported
US dispute readiness
Evidence packet check
Operational preflight for US warranty escalation: packet size, chronology, cross-references, witness checks, source grounding, and backup evidence.
Estimated pack size
6
Proxy count from docs, images, comments, and claim lines. Actual PDF pages still need final preflight.
Evidence packet lane
Compact packet candidate
Small enough for a compact escalation packet, assuming final PDFs stay clean.
Chronology
Ready to order
Visible span: May 7, 2026, 5:05 AM to Jun 24, 2026, 3:05 PM.
Indexed evidence
3 docs / 1 images
Use only the strongest evidence in the escalation packet; keep the rest as support material.
Cross-reference base
Available
Line items, comments, or gap flags can be tied back to supporting material.
Witness verification
Human verification required
Any statement or affidavit output must be checked by the witness before use.
AI / citation gate
Manual check required
Escalation material must keep facts, inferences, citations, and source documents separated.
Expert evidence pressure
Not signalled
No expert-evidence trigger is visible from the current image rollup.
Escalation posture
Escalation watch
178 days open in the visible workflow; risk score 0.00.
Claim Summary
Evidence summary
No evidence summary yet.
Path
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/GRE 8220/Write Off/10966/Pre-Authorization (4).pdf
Timeline
First seen May 7, 2026, 5:05 AM • last seen Jun 24, 2026, 3:05 PM
Evidence flags
No active evidence gap flags
Comment Intelligence
Thread depth
4 indexed side comments on this claim.
Latest visible thread signal
Oct 20, 2026, 5:20 PM • processor • TESTING AND LEARNING — Testing/Learning claim: GRE 8220 / Write Off / RO 10966. WHY UNPAID: PA03723082 was denied August 19, 2024 because the missing bearing cap was not accepted as a defect in materials or workmanship.
Role mix
Dealer 0 • OEM 0 • Processor 4
Decision cues
Denial signals 2 • info / missing-doc asks 7 • approval signals 0
Best move
Work missing-doc or reply asks first from the thread.
Quick Actions
Back to search results
Run the same search again.
Open focused evidence thread
Jump straight into Dropbox side comments, notes, and support documents.
Open claim explorer
Return to the main recovery queue view.
Open evidence room
See the quick-rule cards first, then open the legal basis only if needed.
Claim Lines
complaint
Missing bearing cap, customer noticed upon delivery of the unit that the bearing cap was missing.
partial-match • confidence 0.36
complaint
Missing bearing cap, customer noticed upon delivery of the unit that the bearing cap was missing.
needs-review • confidence 0.09
cause
Bearing cap missing.
partial-match • confidence 0.36
cause
Bearing cap missing.
needs-review • confidence 0.09
correction
Order and replace bearing cap and install it. KRV – The issue submitted is not considered a warranty defect in materials or workmanship PreAuthorization number: PA03723082 For paper claims only only use one preauthorization number per warranty claim form Staple a copy of this preauthorization to a warranty claim form. Fill out the header information and the
needs-review • confidence 0.31
correction
Order and replace bearing cap and install it. KRV – The issue submitted is not considered a warranty defect in materials or workmanship PreAuthorization number: PA03723082 For paper claims only only use one preauthorization number per warranty claim form Staple a copy of this preauthorization to a warranty claim form. Fill out the header information and the
needs-review • confidence 0.05
Evidence Thread
Alix Mongiat
processor • Aug 16, 2024, 3:10 PM
@ANNA F Does this need a PA? You placed it in PA pending. Thanks!
Alix Mongiat
processor • Aug 18, 2024, 11:46 AM
PA03723082 has been submitted for approval.
Alix Mongiat
processor • Aug 19, 2024, 1:32 PM
@ANNA F This was denied: The issue submitted is not considered a warranty defect in materials or worksmanship.
iClaims AI
processor • Oct 20, 2026, 5:20 PM
TESTING AND LEARNING — Testing/Learning claim: GRE 8220 / Write Off / RO 10966. WHY UNPAID: PA03723082 was denied August 19, 2024 because the missing bearing cap was not accepted as a defect in materials or workmanship. The RO says it was noticed upon delivery; the photo shows one missing cap, but does not prove when it went missing or why. WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE DIFFERENTLY: record the shortage on the dated arrival/PDI paperwork with photos; distinguish a cap missing on receipt from one lost later; document any defective retention and route the claim to the supported OEM, axle/component, or delivery-shortage process. Record installation, actual labor and part cost before claiming reimbursement. MONEY: the RO total is $0.00, with zero billed hours and part quantity zero. The $7.27 shown is a unit price, not a billed loss. The PA requested 0.10 hour; its 0.20 base-hour figure is not an approval. Per the owner this is an unpaid/write-off learning claim, but the packet does not quantify a written-off receivable. Do not assume payment could have been guaranteed. @Chris B @Heidi H @Tricia H
Claim Files
Pre-Authorization (4).pdf
approval-artifact • Aug 19, 2024, 1:33 PM • 54,063 bytes
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/GRE 8220/Write Off/10966/Pre-Authorization (4).pdf
10966LINE1.pdf
main-pdf • Aug 18, 2024, 11:45 AM • 133,690 bytes
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/GRE 8220/Write Off/10966/10966LINE1.pdf
10966.pdf
main-pdf • Aug 16, 2024, 12:37 PM • 69,810 bytes
/home/openclaw/nas/Dropbox/GRE 8220/Write Off/10966/10966.pdf